# Estimating the Final number of deaths in China from Coronavirus. Is the final death toll going to be less than 3000 deaths?

In another post we looked at using a logistic curve (S-Curve) to estimate the total number of deaths from Coronavirus in China.

A scaled S-Curve appears suitable to approximate death data. Here is the curve again: In another post we also looked at using a quadratic function to fit the reported death data.

Clearly the above S-Curve has half the final total at its half-way point at (0,0.5).

A scaled S-Curve will retain this feature.

The official death figures can be found at:
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/ To estimate the final death total, all we need to do is first look at where we think the half-way mark is, and double that number. We assume this will occur on a half-day.

This means that the estimate for final total number of deaths will be the actual number of deaths for the day above that half-way mark plus the total number of deaths for the previous day.

We can calculate the estimated final total for all days that may be a suitable half-way mark then compare this to the number of deaths for the current day.

In a post on Monday of this week I calculated this number to be 4,135 deaths using data from 19 February (and 18 February). This total now appears too high, so we looked at data from earlier days.

Data from 14 February (plus 13 February, d=23 and d=22, where d is the number of days after 22 January 2020) gave an estimated total of 2909 deaths at a mid-point at 22.5 days (total days to reach 2909 deaths is therefore 45 days). This day (14 February) was initially chosen because it gave the most consistent figure after looking at the paired totals for each day around those dates.

The actual latest total number of deaths (For 26 February; day 35) is 2801 deaths. This includes about 50 deaths outside of China. There were only 38 new deaths on this day.

As in my previous post, we can use the actual increases from before 14 February and add them in reverse order to form an S-Curve.

We can also do the same for a quadratic fitted to the totals.

This produces the following graph: The following quadratic was fitted by “eye-ometer”:

Number of Deaths (D) = 2.82d^2+28 where d is the number of days since 22 January.

The half-way point at d=22.5 days gives 1,455.625 deaths. Doubling this number gives the final death total of  2911.5 deaths on day 45.

Adding on the daily increases from the quadratic before 14 February gives 2913 deaths (very close).

We also fit (by “eye-ometer”) the following Logistic S-Curve to the data:

D = L/(1+Exp(F(do-d)))

where L=2909, do = 22.5, and F = 7.9/45

This eventually also gave a total or 2909 deaths (some days after day 45).

Here is the new graph combined with the previous graph: Note the colour change in the above graph.

Conclusions

An S-curve appears to be suitable for representing the data.

We can estimate the total number of deaths by progressively adding each day’s total to the total from the day before (we are only adding two numbers together). By looking at the actual number of deaths several days later we can choose an estimate that looks suitable. This estimate can be confirmed or rejected on later days.

From the official data it appears the final death toll in China from Coronavirus is unlikely to be less than 3000, assuming no new outbreak in China.

If not the next milestones will be 3200 then 3500 deaths.

The current number of deaths in China is about 2808  for 27 February (after about 50 deaths outside China are deducted for day 36) so 3200 or maybe even 3500 appears a more likely figure than 3000.

Already the current total (for 27 February) is about 200 more than the calculated estimates.

So the the most likely estimate for the final number of deaths appears to be between 3200 and 3500 deaths.

Alan Grace
28 February 2020

I share my posts here:
https://guestdailyposts.wordpress.com/guest-pingbacks/

Reminder: 